Warning: Undefined array key "session_id" in C:\inetpub\www.sweetrides2001.com\modules\Forums\viewtopic.php on line 1380

Evolution vs. WRX STI

by GDAWG

If you had to pick one, what would it be? EVO VIII or WRX STI?

( 5 ) ( 63% ) Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
( 3 ) ( 38% ) Suburu Impreza WRX STI
Wed Dec 24, 2003 3:51 am
SR2K1 Senior Gearhead
172 Posts
Choose between these two indesputible powerhouses.
Leave a comment about why or why not one or the other.


'95 Trans Am (working) & '91 3000GT VR-4 (broken) & '94 3000GT VR-4 (broken)
Wed Dec 24, 2003 3:59 am
SR2K1 ADDICT!
1828 Posts
I voted for the Impreza because its crazy to see what those things can do on the road, as well as off the road in Rally racing!

Tom



1972 Corvette Stingray and 1968 Mustang Coupe
Wed Dec 24, 2003 4:05 am
SR2K1 Senior Gearhead
172 Posts
I would choose the Evolution Exclamation

It makes more effcient power from a smaller engine (2.0 liter in Evo makes 271 hp, 2.4 liter in STI makes 300 hp) and has a higher power:weight ratio.

The Evo has aftermarket parts already built in like Brembo brakes and Sparco seats. The Evo even has a water sprayer for the intercooler Exclamation
Plus, the engine is the same model used in the first generation turbo Eclipse/Laser/Talon, so there is definate aftermarket support for that.

Moreover, it is the cheaper of the two cars and has 'evolved' since the introduction of the first lancer in the late '80's/early '90's.

Just my thoughts Driving


'95 Trans Am (working) & '91 3000GT VR-4 (broken) & '94 3000GT VR-4 (broken)
Thu Jan 22, 2004 3:01 am
SR2K1 Senior Gearhead
172 Posts
OK, now I don't know.

After visiting the Motor Trend International Auto show, I am leaning towards the WRX STI.

The build quality of the EVO wasn't what I thought it would be and I didn't even see a boost gauge Question

The WRX STI felt more solid and the seat and controls were more pleasing to me. It had a boost gauge on the steering column---it was in your face.

Regardless, I'm sure both of these cars wouldn't disappoint, however, I was still suprised Thumbs Up


'95 Trans Am (working) & '91 3000GT VR-4 (broken) & '94 3000GT VR-4 (broken)
Thu Jan 22, 2004 3:25 am
SR2K1 ADDICT!
1828 Posts
Thats true, the WRX did have the boost gauge placed in an odd spot, but I guess thats better than not having one at all. Also, I like the way the WRX looks overall with the functional hood scoop and the body... Sweet Ride Thumbs Up

Tom



1972 Corvette Stingray and 1968 Mustang Coupe
Thu Jan 22, 2004 5:07 am
SR2K1 ADDICT!
1585 Posts
Both are bad ass rides, but im still going to have to go with the EVO. I really liked the way that one looked.

Jeremy


Mon Jan 26, 2004 4:56 pm
SR2K1 Gearhead
20 Posts
i would go with the evo. since i know someone that has one.
Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:07 pm
SR2K1 Senior Gearhead
309 Posts
im all about the sti b/c they are a more purpose built machine they seem to me that they would have rather attracted buyers with numbers not looks...although i think the sti looks better the evo just seems to try to hard for a stock car.